May 17, 2012
This article has been tagged to these categories:

What’s right for your organization?

New study: the best way to get from point clouds to parametric solid models

by Sam Pfeifle | October 11, 2011

NORMAN, Okla. – Last summer, Dr. Kuang-Hua Chang, Williams Companies Foundation Presidential Professor at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma, was given a task by Tinker Air Force Base, outside of Oklahoma City: figure out the best way to get a parametric solid model from a point cloud created by a laser scanner.

Tinker is one of the major repair and overhaul locations for the Air Force and has used Dr. Chang in the past as a consultant on engineering projects. Recently, reverse engineering has become a major theme. As planes like the F-14 now enter their third and fourth decades of operation, parts break, and there often are no modern CAD models for those parts. How do you make a copy in a hurry?

Enter Dr. Chang.

“They wanted to know what’s in the market and what can they do to utilize the current technology,” Chang said in an interview with SPAR Point Group. “They already have several very nice scanners. They have Leica handheld, with a probe, and then an ATOS 3 - both are top of the line in my opinion.”

“But they didn’t have the software for when they get those points to put them together and come up with something that they can use in a short time frame,” he said. “So they wanted us to find out what their options were.”

That question, and the study that ensued, goes to the heart of questions that manufacturing firms and nascent reverse engineering firms are asking themselves every day. The answers they’re coming to ought to be informed by Chang’s conclusions, but SPAR investigation suggests the conclusion of Chang’s study and the conclusions reached by individual companies might be different, depending on the goals of the organization.

Continued...

Comments

10/13/2011 1:55:56 AM Seyob Kim says:
starStarStarstarstar
I guess real CAD expert also don't want to learn another way to get the solid model from point cloud which is totally different with what they usually do as the gerneral feature modeling in their CAD system. Additionally, handling and polishing mesh processes are not familiar with them at all.
If big CAD s/w includes the similar capability with Rapidform, it could be an ultimate tool for RE. Before that, well..., there is no choice better than the integrated tool.
10/12/2011 7:04:48 PM Tom Charron says:
starstarstarstarstar
Well-researched article, Sam. I'd like to point out some conflicting information in it, though. Mr. Soucy mentions that the models made in Rapidform XOR are "dumb" after opening them in CAD, but that's not the case. The whole point of Rapidform's liveTransfer functionality is that the models have a full feature tree in the downstream CAD program. The time needed to make an accurate model inside Rapidform and transfer it to CAD is *much* shorter than the "extract a few bits of info from point cloud software, then do all the real work in CAD" approach. We prove this day-in and day-out in the real world.

It's important to note that engineering design is a truly interactive process requiring trial and error to figure out the optimal modeling parameters. It's true for regular CAD design as well as reverse engineering. That's why XOR's parametric modeling tools are not there just for transferring equivalent modeling steps to CAD apps but to facilitate model editing, especially trial and error based
Rating:

Comment:

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register

 
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Divisions | eMedia | Events | Publications | © 2010 Diversified Business Communications. All rights reserved.
Diversified Business Communications